The mongols aren t as barbaric

Yes, the mongols did horribly kill and treat people, however, theoretically aren't all battles and wars barbaric of course if someone were to come into your village and suddenly claim everything under their rule, you would have a strong hatred towards them. Next, the military organization proved mongols’ good arrangement ability which lead to a result that they aren’t barbarian mongols knew how to use silk as a tool to practice their skills (document 2). In document 3, the mongols aren't displayed as (in my opinion) barbaric as much as they are strategic for example, they created a formation of their military in such a way that the stronger men would surround the enemy then close in on them.

Stirrups confer advantages, but they aren't actually needed for archery or for lancing click to expand with the stirrup you don't need a horsemen that trained for life. The united states department of justice’s ongoing attempts to destroy the mongols motorcycle club seems to be having an ironic effect aren’t you the same . Mongols conquered europe but even these grasslands probably aren't extensive enough to support a full nomadic nation in its traditional lifestyle - that's why . Mongols aren't regarded as barbaric because they were efficient in battle, rather because of their widespread whole sale slaughter of civilian populations that's not to take away from your points, they had many advances socially and otherwise but saying they weren't utterly brutal is white washing history.

A barbarian is a human but they regarded their culture as barbaric many han chinese writers did not celebrate the collapse of the mongols and the return of . The mongols are constantly seen as an brutal and uncivilized empire by historians however, when you take a closer look at this civilization, there is a controversy over whether they are as barbaric as previously thought or not they have many impressive achievements that affected the citizens and . Mongol empire -vs- roman empire the mongols probably can defeat pretty much any roman army in open combat with its mobile archery and calvary aren't going to . Mongol civilized over barbaric dbq the eastern hemisphere of the world witnessed the rise of the mongol empire the mongols, who had been previously living in the steppes mountains and divided into multiple different tribes were united by genghis khan into one nation.

Even though the conquests aren’t the focus of the work, the clearly annihilative and barbaric aspects of khan’s expanding kingdom are downplayed and not suitably reconciled with weatherford’s picture of a noble statesman. Some people claim that turkic people in asia are 100% pure mongoloid and look the same as mongols look carefully at shapes of the heads, the noses, the eyes, the cheekbones and try to notice the . And then saying that comments related to the question aren't appropriate why didn't you just censor the whole post, from the article on down, if you think history has nothing to do with the present and future.

The mongols aren t as barbaric

the mongols aren t as barbaric The mongols were not very barbaric because they had a highly sophisticated military, lived by a code of conduct, and helped improve the lives of those they conquered the mongols had a very structured.

Mongols dbq there are a lot of different views on the mongols and their tactics some people believe the mongols weren’t barbaric and viewed them as extremely strategic and intelligent. I'm doing an editorial on this for an online history course, and i realize the vikings aren't as barbaric as they were once described to be but does that take away the title of "most barbaric" away from them. the mongols aren’t as barbaric as people think in the twelfth century, genghis khan united the mongol clans and created an empire he conquered much of asia but killed many people and destroyed many towns in the process.

  • The mongols had perfected the use of light cavalry, people focus a lot of their archory skills and horsemanship, they were also the master of other weapons on the horse that cavalry aren't familiar with.
  • The mongols quickly grew tired of this, and decided that they needed to take more drastic measures they decided that if they couldn’t find all of the men who were hiding inside the city, they would just burn the entire city down.
  • Should the mongols be a civilization contribute too much to history doesn't mean we aren't now (not talking bout the war)i mean fiberoptic networks, satilite tv .

The kurgans live farther east and are fearsome steppe horsemen similar to the turks or mongols, and threaten the distant lands of cathay aren't bothered, but . Mongol invasion of germany the mongol invasion is more likely to give the coup-de-grâce if they aren't beaten if those forces couldn't stop the mongols . Mongols aren't coming why aren't they coming showing 1-15 of 34 comments shadowwolf may 3, 2014 @ 9:24pm is the pope still around if something happened . The mongols weren't barbaric due to the effective way they organize their empire, their tolerance towards the other people they conquer, and the advancements they made in their economy and empire the mongols had a very organized empire with evenly divided cities, effective systems, and a well-ordered and efficient army.

the mongols aren t as barbaric The mongols were not very barbaric because they had a highly sophisticated military, lived by a code of conduct, and helped improve the lives of those they conquered the mongols had a very structured. the mongols aren t as barbaric The mongols were not very barbaric because they had a highly sophisticated military, lived by a code of conduct, and helped improve the lives of those they conquered the mongols had a very structured.
The mongols aren t as barbaric
Rated 3/5 based on 33 review
Download

2018.